0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°£È£»çÀÇ È¯ÀÚÂü¿© °£È£¼­ºñ½º ¼öÇàÁ¤µµ¿Í Çʿ伺 ÀνÄ

Nurses¡¯ Perception of the Performance and Necessity of Nursing Services for Patients Engagement

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2019³â 25±Ç 2È£ p.120 ~ 132
KMID : 1004620190250020120
ÀÌÅÂÈ­ ( Lee Tae-Wha ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

À忬¼ö ( Jang Yeon-Soo ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
ÁöÀ±Á¤ ( Ji Yoon-Jung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
µµÇö¿Á ( Do Hyun-Ok ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¿À°æȯ ( Oh Kyoung-Hwan ) - ¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø
±èâ°æ ( Kim Chang-Kyung ) - ¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø
õÀÚÇý ( Chun Ja-Hye ) - ¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø ÀûÁ¤Áø·á°ü¸®ÆÀ
½ÅÇý°æ ( Shin Hae-Kyung ) - ¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø
Á¶¹Ì¿µ ( Cho Mee-Young ) - ¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø
¹èÁ¤ÀÓ ( Bae Jung-Im ) - ¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº °£È£»çÀÇ È¯ÀÚÂü¿© °£È£¼­ºñ½º ¼öÇà Á¤µµ¿Í ȯÀÚÂü¿© °£È£¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû¿ë Çʿ伺¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤µµ¸¦ ÆľÇÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â Á¶»ç¿¬±¸ÀÌ´Ù.

¹æ¹ý: º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¼­¼úÀû Á¶»ç¿¬±¸·Î ÃÑ 205¸íÀÇ °£È£»ç°¡ ¼³¹®¿¡ ÀÀ´äÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¿¬±¸ÀÚ°¡ Smart Patient Engagement Assessment Checklist¸¦ °³¹ßÇÏ¿©, ȯÀÚÂü¿© °£È£¼­ºñ½º ÇöȲ ¹× ÀÓ»óÀû¿ë Çʿ伺ÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä ¼öÁØÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÚ·á´Â ¿Â¶óÀÎ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ À§ÇØ ¼öÁýµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼öÁýµÈ ÀÚ·á´Â SPSS 25.0ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±â¼úÅë°è, Ä«À̺м®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ´ë»óÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ¿¬·ÉÀº 36.62¡¾8.5¼¼¿´À¸¸ç, Æò±Õ °æ·ÂÀº 12.92¡¾9.23³â À̾ú´Ù. ´ë»óÀÚÀÇ 78.1%°¡ ȯÀÚ¿Í °¡Á·ÀÌ °í°´ °ÇÀÇÇÔ ¶Ç´Â °í°´ ¸¸Á·µµ Æò°¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ Á¶¾ðÀÚ·Î Âü¿©ÇÑ´Ù°í ÀÀ´äÇÏ¿´°í, Á¶¾ðÀڷμ­ ȯÀÚ°¡ Âü¿©ÇÏ´Â °Í¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÀ´äÀº 1000º´»ó ÀÌ»óÀÇ º´¿ø¿¡¼­ ÇöÀúÈ÷ ³ô¾Ò´Ù(¥ö©÷=28.54, p<.001). ÀÇ»ç¼ÒÅë ¿µ¿ª¿¡¼­´Â ´ë»óÀÚÀÇ 88.8%°¡ ȯÀÚÀÇ ´ÙÇÐÁ¦Àû Ä¡·á°áÁ¤À» À§ÇØ ÀÇ»ç¼ÒÅëÇÑ´Ù°í ÀÀ´äÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÀ´äÀ²Àº 1000º´»ó À̻󿡼­ ½ÃÇàÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù°í ÀÀ´äÇÑ °ÍÀÌ ÇöÀúÇÏ°Ô ³ô¾Ò´Ù(¥ö©÷=6.30, p=.012). °£È£»ç ħ»óÀΰèÀÇ °æ¿ì ´ë»óÀÚÀÇ 22.0%¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù°í ÀÀ´äÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, º´»ó¼öº° À¯ÀǹÌÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. Åð¿ø°èȹ¿¡¼­´Â ´ë»óÀÚÀÇ 72.2%°¡ Åð¿øÀ» À§ÇÑ Ã¼Å©¸®½ºÆ®¸¦ È°¿ëÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù°í ÀÀ´äÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á·Ð: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ ÅëÇØ °£È£¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ȯÀÚÂü¿© °³³äÀÌ ºÎºÐÀûÀ¸·Î Àû¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª, ȯÀÚÂü¿© °³³äÀÌ Àû¿ëµÈ ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °£È£¼­ºñ½º ¼öÇàÀº ¾ÆÁ÷ ¹ÌÈíÇÑ °ÍÀ» È®ÀεǾú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ȯÀÚÀÇ °Ç°­ ¼º°ú¿Í ¾ÈÀü ÁõÁøÀ» À§ÇØ È¯ÀÚÂü¿© °£È£¼­ºñ½º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»ó ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀÇ °³¹ßÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the performance of patient engagement nursing services perceived by nurses and necessity in Korea.

Methods: This study was a descriptive research. A total of 205 nurses participated in the study. The Smart Patient Engagement Assessment Checklist was developed by the investigators to assess patient engagement nursing services performance and necessity. The data were collected using online survey. Descriptive analysis and x2 analysis were performed using SPSS 25.0 program.

Results: The mean age of participants was 36.6¡¾8.5 years and the mean working experience was 12.92¡¾9.23 years. Seventy eight percent of participants reported that patients and family participated in care as advisors through customer¡¯s suggestion or patient satisfaction assessment. The rate of patients¡¯ and family¡¯s engagement in care as advisors was significantly higher in tertiary hospitals(x2=28.54, p<.001). About 89% of participants communicated with patients and family to make clinical decisions with a multidisciplinary approach. The rate of communication for multidisciplinary decision making was significantly higher in tertiary hospitals(x2=6.30, p=.012). With regards to nurses¡¯ bedside patient handoff, 22.0% of participants reported that they were performing bedside patient handoff, and there was no significant difference between type of hospitals. About discharge planning, 72.2% of participants reported utilizing discharge checklist.

Conclusion: Currently, patient engagement nursing services are applied partially in Korea. It seems that care protocols to be applied for patient engagement nursing services are insufficient. Therefore, patient engagement care protocols need to be developed to improve patient¡¯s health outcome and safety
KeyWords
ȯÀÚÂü¿©, °£È£¼­ºñ½º, ¿ä±¸µµ Á¶»ç
Patient Engagement, Nursing Services, Needs Assessment
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)